Match statistics snapshot
- Instituto Cordoba created the clearer chances on xG (1.09 vs 0.44, Δ 0.65).
- Lanus fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Instituto Cordoba was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 1.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.44 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 213 | Accurate passes | 357Lead |
| 305 | Total passes | 462Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |