Match statistics snapshot
- Instituto Cordoba created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 0.54, Δ 0.83).
- Instituto Cordoba fired more attempts (22 vs 15 shots).
- Instituto Cordoba was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.54 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 350 | Accurate passes | 394Lead |
| 433 | Total passes | 474Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 1.23 | Goals prevented | 1.23 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Lanus |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |