Match statistics snapshot
- River Plate fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 10%).
- River Plate held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 174 | Accurate passes | 363Lead |
| 239 | Total passes | 435Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |