Match statistics snapshot
- Instituto Cordoba fired more attempts (5 vs 3 shots).
- Velez Sarsfield was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 0%).
- Velez Sarsfield held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 2Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 1Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 33 | Accurate passes | 48Lead |
| 47 | Total passes | 64Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Instituto Cordoba | Statistic | Velez Sarsfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Fouls | 2Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.