Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (3.10 vs 1.39, Δ 1.71).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (19 vs 15 shots).
- Atlas was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 3.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.39 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 357Lead | Accurate passes | 292 |
| 411Lead | Total passes | 345 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Atlas |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |