Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (2.94 vs 1.68, Δ 1.26).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (28 vs 9 shots).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 2.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.68 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 21Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 28Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 523Lead | Accurate passes | 254 |
| 595Lead | Total passes | 317 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.15 | Goals prevented | 0.15 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.