Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (12 vs 5 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 20%).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Cavalier |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Cavalier |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 580Lead | Accurate passes | 202 |
| 688Lead | Total passes | 297 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Cavalier |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Cavalier |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Cavalier |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |