Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (2.77 vs 2.09, Δ 0.68).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 2.77Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.09 |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 493Lead | Accurate passes | 312 |
| 572Lead | Total passes | 375 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |