Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (2.26 vs 1.47, Δ 0.79).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (21 vs 9 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 2.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.47 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 565Lead | Accurate passes | 357 |
| 636Lead | Total passes | 411 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 1.64 | Goals prevented | 1.64 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |