Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (0.66 vs 0.72, Δ 0.06).
- Charlotte fired more attempts (9 vs 4 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 0.66 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.72Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 324 | Accurate passes | 427Lead |
| 391 | Total passes | 480Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 13Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |