Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 1.17, Δ 0.19).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Colorado Rapids was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 41%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 441Lead | Accurate passes | 307 |
| 528Lead | Total passes | 374 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Colorado Rapids |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.