Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (0.83 vs 2.32, Δ 1.49).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 0.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.32Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 497Lead | Accurate passes | 302 |
| 574Lead | Total passes | 354 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |