Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 1.38, Δ 0.32).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.38Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 284 | Accurate passes | 664Lead |
| 357 | Total passes | 737Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.25 | Goals prevented | 0.25 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |