Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 0.73, Δ 1.30).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.73 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 454Lead | Accurate passes | 433 |
| 513Lead | Total passes | 480 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -2.92 | Goals prevented | -2.92 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Columbus Crew |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |