Match statistics snapshot
- DC United created the clearer chances on xG (1.07 vs 1.12, Δ 0.05).
- DC United fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 540Lead | Accurate passes | 236 |
| 626Lead | Total passes | 315 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.12 | Goals prevented | -0.12 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |