Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (3.05 vs 0.94, Δ 2.11).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- DC United was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 41%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 3.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 514Lead | Accurate passes | 275 |
| 584Lead | Total passes | 336 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -0.32 | Goals prevented | -0.32 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.