Match statistics snapshot
- FC Dallas created the clearer chances on xG (0.55 vs 1.87, Δ 1.32).
- FC Dallas fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- FC Dallas was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 0.55 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.87Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 540Lead | Accurate passes | 205 |
| 650Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.