Match statistics snapshot
- FC Dallas created the clearer chances on xG (1.69 vs 2.34, Δ 0.65).
- FC Dallas fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- FC Dallas was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.69 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.34Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 398Lead | Accurate passes | 343 |
| 474Lead | Total passes | 418 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -1.16 | Goals prevented | -1.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.