Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (83% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 404 | Accurate passes | 408Lead |
| 467Lead | Total passes | 456 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.