Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 20%).
- Nashville SC held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 3 |
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 407 | Accurate passes | 494Lead |
| 481 | Total passes | 561Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |