Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (2.74 vs 2.39, Δ 0.35).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.39 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 393Lead | Accurate passes | 336 |
| 478Lead | Total passes | 413 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |