Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (1.03 vs 0.62, Δ 0.41).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 535Lead | Accurate passes | 441 |
| 591Lead | Total passes | 505 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.25 | Goals prevented | -0.25 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.