Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (2.34 vs 0.62, Δ 1.72).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 423Lead | Accurate passes | 327 |
| 482Lead | Total passes | 397 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.99 | Goals prevented | 0.99 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.