Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (2.12 vs 0.58, Δ 1.54).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.58 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 370 |
| 433Lead | Total passes | 429 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.22 | Goals prevented | -1.22 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 21 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.