Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (3.68 vs 2.20, Δ 1.48).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (24 vs 8 shots).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 3.68Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.20 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 564Lead | Accurate passes | 207 |
| 637Lead | Total passes | 277 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.47 | Goals prevented | -0.47 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.