Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (3.00 vs 1.54, Δ 1.46).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 3.00Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.54 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 640Lead | Accurate passes | 294 |
| 703Lead | Total passes | 342 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 6 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| 2 | Goals prevented | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.