Match statistics snapshot
- New York City FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.90 vs 1.62, Δ 0.72).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- New York City FC was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.90 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.62Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 528Lead | Accurate passes | 273 |
| 604Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.