Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (2.48 vs 1.16, Δ 1.32).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.16 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 481Lead | Accurate passes | 371 |
| 571Lead | Total passes | 452 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.