Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (2.55 vs 0.96, Δ 1.59).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- New York City FC was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 43%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.55Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 558Lead | Accurate passes | 368 |
| 629Lead | Total passes | 434 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.29 | Goals prevented | 0.29 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |