Match statistics snapshot
- New York Red Bulls created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 2.40, Δ 1.29).
- New York Red Bulls fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
- New York Red Bulls was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.40Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 439Lead | Accurate passes | 239 |
| 536Lead | Total passes | 320 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.