Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (2.20 vs 0.56, Δ 1.64).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 2.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 459Lead | Accurate passes | 396 |
| 536Lead | Total passes | 463 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.29 | Goals prevented | -1.29 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.