Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (3.06 vs 0.81, Δ 2.25).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3.06Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 387 | Accurate passes | 426Lead |
| 459 | Total passes | 490Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.