Match statistics snapshot
- Orlando City SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 3.05, Δ 1.88).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (21 vs 16 shots).
- Orlando City SC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.05Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 463Lead | Accurate passes | 233 |
| 525Lead | Total passes | 300 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.83 | Goals prevented | 0.83 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.