Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (5.10 vs 4.02, Δ 1.08).
- Philadelphia Union fired more attempts (21 vs 17 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (59% on target vs 48%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 5.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 4.02 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 14 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Shots on target | 10 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 451Lead | Accurate passes | 218 |
| 532Lead | Total passes | 295 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -0.50 | Goals prevented | -0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Philadelphia Union |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |