Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (2.12 vs 1.43, Δ 0.69).
- Sporting Kansas City fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Sporting Kansas City |
|---|---|---|
| 2.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.43 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Sporting Kansas City |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 379 | Accurate passes | 447Lead |
| 453 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Sporting Kansas City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Sporting Kansas City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Sporting Kansas City |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.