Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (1.39 vs 0.71, Δ 0.68).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.71 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 623Lead | Accurate passes | 390 |
| 685Lead | Total passes | 446 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.