Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- Toronto FC held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 322 | Accurate passes | 466Lead |
| 398 | Total passes | 531Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Miami | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |