Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Turku created the clearer chances on xG (2.58 vs 1.06, Δ 1.52).
- Inter Turku fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- FF Jaro was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Turku | Statistic | Ff Jaro |
|---|---|---|
| 2.58Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.06 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Turku | Statistic | Ff Jaro |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 464Lead | Accurate passes | 338 |
| 549Lead | Total passes | 410 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Turku | Statistic | Ff Jaro |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Turku | Statistic | Ff Jaro |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Turku | Statistic | Ff Jaro |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |