Match statistics snapshot
- Ilves created the clearer chances on xG (0.87 vs 1.54, Δ 0.67).
- Inter Turku fired more attempts (8 vs 5 shots).
- Ilves was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter Turku | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 0.87 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.54Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter Turku | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 538Lead | Accurate passes | 288 |
| 616Lead | Total passes | 340 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter Turku | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter Turku | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter Turku | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.