Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (0.87 vs 0.32, Δ 0.55).
- Inter fired more attempts (15 vs 4 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 0.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.32 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 479Lead | Accurate passes | 243 |
| 572Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |