Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (2.65 vs 1.06, Δ 1.59).
- Inter fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 2.65Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.06 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 282 | Accurate passes | 475Lead |
| 340 | Total passes | 526Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |