Match statistics snapshot
- AC Milan created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 1.70, Δ 0.97).
- AC Milan fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- AC Milan was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 448Lead | Accurate passes | 338 |
| 504Lead | Total passes | 398 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.04 | Goals prevented | 0.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |