Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (2.11 vs 0.33, Δ 1.78).
- Inter fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Atalanta |
|---|---|---|
| 2.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.33 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Atalanta |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 528Lead | Accurate passes | 352 |
| 590Lead | Total passes | 409 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Atalanta |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Atalanta |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Atalanta |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |