Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (2.30 vs 0.62, Δ 1.68).
- Inter fired more attempts (19 vs 7 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (26% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Atletico Madrid |
|---|---|---|
| 2.30Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.62 |
| Offsides | ||
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Atletico Madrid |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 536Lead | Accurate passes | 403 |
| 615Lead | Total passes | 480 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Atletico Madrid |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Atletico Madrid |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Atletico Madrid |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |