Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (2.29 vs 1.74, Δ 0.55).
- Inter fired more attempts (30 vs 7 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 2.29Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 26Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 30Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 525Lead | Accurate passes | 185 |
| 602Lead | Total passes | 261 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.01 | Goals prevented | -0.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |