Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (1.56 vs 0.33, Δ 1.23).
- Inter fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Inter vs Como
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.33 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 452Lead | Accurate passes | 248 |
| 514Lead | Total passes | 308 |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.27 | Goals prevented | -0.27 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |