Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 1.02, Δ 0.40).
- Como fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 294 | Accurate passes | 440Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 500Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.66 | Goals prevented | -0.66 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |