Match statistics snapshot
- Inter fired more attempts (22 vs 15 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 36%).
- Inter held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| 6Lead |
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 530Lead | Accurate passes | 309 |
| 591Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 6 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |