Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (3.57 vs 0.64, Δ 2.93).
- Inter fired more attempts (27 vs 3 shots).
- Cremonese was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 3.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 525Lead | Accurate passes | 243 |
| 595Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.21 | Goals prevented | -0.21 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |