Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (2.19 vs 1.50, Δ 0.69).
- Feyenoord fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 2.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.50 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 89% |
| 501Lead | Accurate passes | 390 |
| 552Lead | Total passes | 437 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.08 | Goals prevented | 0.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Feyenoord |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |